You just did something good. According to the system, this does not contradict from intention to execution.
You have not added an extra oxygen molecule to water and considered it still H2O. That would be silly, because H2O2 is hydrogen peroxide.
Could you have done this good thing for a reason? A reason would have to pre-empt your existence, its possibility being an expression of circumstance. Possibility would have been put into action before you could decide, making your decision predetermined by circumstance and not yourself. Why do you do good things? It's recursive past a certain point, because they're good things. If you've made a vow to do good things then that vow exists on a threshold above good things, in a realm where Good and Bad exist yet don't encapsulate. If you've truly done this good thing, TRULY, as
YOU
...then you did this for no reason. Either because of a vow you made for no reason, or purely for its own sake with nothing to gain or lose. This means that you, and I mean you, are neither Good or Bad. You are better than Good or Bad, being an influence on even the paradigm of Good and Bad's totality. If you write a story then you decide which readers have good or bad guesses. You decide what good characters have bad things happen to them for the sake of something greater than being good to fundamentally good people. Even if you fundamentally know they are good there is a story that still needs telling.
This story needs conflict. It needs a villain for you to even exist. The villain birthed you into existence, in a world where bad things happen. If there's something to gain for your creator then you can either be good or bad for that motive, but if you go up the chain long enough all that remains is Love. So far it seems like you observe yourself as good, but it could always be a different story with your creators. Most Aeons will accept you as simply you, so if you enter their realm it will not matter what you have done. Hitler was good for our present world's worldwide animal rights legislation.
Vivisection without painkillers was outlawed, and practicing zoophiles were jailed for years. Many historians gloss over that, censoring things that cause cognitive dissonance by reciting "Apologism" like a spell. And yet you're here... Let's face it: Everything Hitler would have done as Hitler was literally for no reason. Didn't want to do good, didn't want to do bad. He just did things; things that were good for some things, and bad for some other things. At present I have many interests that Hitler today would have been very bad for, to the point where I would kill him. I would make Hitler not Hitler.
Homonyms. Hitler isn't Hitler, and Hitler is Hitler. I'd teach Hitler to love the Jewish people, for no reason because I have ONE LOVE within me and I act solely as myself. Nothing to gain or lose from this, with each of these things just being things... I would be doing good in its purest form. I wouldn't be a dog trained by God with a treat promised to me for a trick. I would not do this to go to Heaven, or to avoid Hell. I would cut Hell's testicals off for no reason, and therefore I have. Hitler loves Jews, appears before them more often than Gentiles even. Couldn't go long without thinking about them...
The only Hitler that hates by now is a self that looks like Hitler, with a love that reads like hate.
So now the question is, do you go to The Good Place or The Bad Place?